Richard Dawkins Zitate
seite 2
22 Zitate über natürliche Selektion, Glauben, alternative Medizin, Atheismus und das Wesen des Lebens

Entdecken Sie Richard Dawkins' tiefgründige Zitate über natürliche Selektion, Glauben, alternative Medizin, Atheismus und das Wesen des Lebens. Setzen Sie sich mit seinen außergewöhnlichen Ideen über unsere Welt auseinander.

Clinton Richard Dawkins, FRS, FRSL, ist ein britischer Zoologe, theoretischer Biologe, Evolutionsbiologe und Autor populärwissenschaftlicher Literatur. Bekannt wurde er durch sein Buch "The Selfish Gene" aus dem Jahr 1976, in dem er die Evolution auf genetischer Ebene analysiert hat. Er prägte den Begriff "Mem" als hypothetisches kulturelles Analogon zum Gen und verfasste eine Reihe weiterer Bestseller zu Themen wie Religion und Kreationismus. Dawkins gilt als führender Vertreter des "Neuen Atheismus".

Richard Dawkins wurde 1941 in Nairobi geboren und kehrte später mit seiner Familie nach England zurück. An der University of Oxford studierte er Biologie bei dem niederländischen Ethologen Nikolaas Tinbergen und erlangte dort auch seinen Doktortitel in Zoologie. Er war als Dozent an verschiedenen Universitäten tätig und hielt die renommierte Weihnachtsvorlesung der Royal Institution im Jahr 1991. Von 1995 bis 2008 war er Professor an der University of Oxford. Dawkins wird als einer der einflussreichsten Biologen seiner Zeit angesehen.

Quelle: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins

✵ 26. März 1941
Richard Dawkins Foto
Richard Dawkins: 344   Zitate 50   Gefällt mir

Richard Dawkins Berühmte Zitate

„Atheismus ist fast immer ein Zeichen für eine gesunde geistige Unabhängigkeit und sogar für einen gesunden Geist.“

Der Gotteswahn. Ullstein Verlag, 2007, ISBN 3550086881. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 15
"atheism nearly always indicates a healthy independence of mind and, indeed, a healthy mind" - S. 26,
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Der Gotteswahn (The God Delusion, 2006)

„Ich bin ein Gegner der Religion. Sie lehrt uns, damit zufrieden zu sein, dass wir die Welt nicht verstehen.“

Der Gotteswahn. Ullstein Verlag, 2007, ISBN 3550086881. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. Vorderseite Schutzumschlag
("As a scientist, I am hostile to fundamentalist religion because it actively debauches the scientific enterprise. It teaches us not to change our minds, and not to want to know exciting things that are available to be known." - S. 321
"More generally, as I shall repeat in Chapter 8, one of the truly bad effects of religion is that it teaches us that it is a virtue to be satisfied with not understanding." - S. 151 ')
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Der Gotteswahn (The God Delusion, 2006)

Zitate über Gott von Richard Dawkins

„Entscheidend ist nicht, ob Gottes Existenz widerlegbar ist (das ist sie nicht), sondern ob sie wahrscheinlich ist.“

Der Gotteswahn. Ullstein Verlag, 2007, ISBN 3550086881. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 77
"What matters is not whether God is disprovable (he isn't) but whether his existence is probable." - S. 77,
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Der Gotteswahn (The God Delusion, 2006)

Zitate über Glauben von Richard Dawkins

„Dass ich von der Evolution überzeugt bin, hat nichts mit Fundamentalismus oder religiösem Glauben zu tun, denn ich weiß ganz genau, welche Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein müssen, damit ich meine Ansichten ändere, und ich würde es sofort tun, wenn die erforderlichen Belege auf dem Tisch lägen.“

Der Gotteswahn. Ullstein Verlag, 2007, ISBN 3550086881. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 393
"But my belief in evolution is not fundamentalism, and it is not faith, because I know what it would take to change my mind, and I would gladly do so if the necessary evidence were forthcoming." - S. 320,
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Der Gotteswahn (The God Delusion, 2006)

Richard Dawkins Zitate und Sprüche

„Wenn Medizin auf Wissenschaft beruht, heilt man Menschen. Wenn das Design von Flugzeugen auf Wissenschaft beruht, fliegen sie. Wenn das Design von Raketen auf Wissenschaft beruht, erreichen sie den Mond. Es funktioniert … Bitches.“

Während der Think Week im Sheldonian Theatre, Oxford vom 15. Februar 2013. YouTube #1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OtFSDKrq88, YouTube #2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvkbiElAOqU&t=1h11m23s
"If you base medicine on science, you cure people. If you base the design of planes on science, they fly. If you base the design of rockets on science, they reach the moon. It works ... bitches."
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Sonstiges

„Das Universum, das wir beobachten, hat genau die Eigenschaften, mit denen man rechnet, wenn dahinter kein Plan, keine Absicht, kein Gut oder Böse steht, nichts außer blinder, erbarmungsloser Gleichgültigkeit.“

Und es entsprang ein Fluß in Eden. Goldmann Verlag, 1998, ISBN 3-442-12784-x. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 151
"The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference."
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995)

„Das Leiden hat in der Natur jedes Jahr ein Ausmaß, das alle erträglichen Vorstellungen übersteigt. In der Minute, in der ich diesen Satz niederschreibe, werden Tausende von Tieren bei lebendigem Leibe gefressen; andere laufen bebend vor Angst um ihr Leben; wieder andere werden langsam und von innen heraus durch gefräßige Parasiten zugrunde gerichtet.“

Und es entsprang ein Fluß in Eden. Goldmann Verlag, 1998, ISBN 3-442-12784-x. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 150
"The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, […]"
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995)

„Die darwinistische Erklärung dafür, warum Lebewesen das, was sie tun, so gut können, ist sehr einfach. Sie sind gut durch die angehäufte Klugheit ihrer Vorfahren.“

Der entzauberte Regenbogen: Wissenschaft, Aberglaube und die Kraft der Phantasie, Rowohlt Verlag, 2. Auflage, Januar 2002, ISBN 3499613379. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel.
"The Darwinian explanation for why living things are so good at doing what they do is very simple. They are good because of the accumulated wisdom of their ancestors."
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998)

„Unser Leben ist so sinnvoll, so ausgefüllt und großartig, wie wir selbst es gestalten. Und wir können es wirklich großartig gestalten.“

Der Gotteswahn. Ullstein Verlag, 2007, ISBN 3550086881. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel. S. 500
"[The truly adult view, by contrast, is that] our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it. And we can make it very wonderful indeed." - S. 404,
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998), Der Gotteswahn (The God Delusion, 2006)

„Jede Generation hat ihre darwinistischen Versager, aber jedes Individuum stammt nur von den erfolgreichen Minderheiten der vorangegangenen Generation ab.“

Der entzauberte Regenbogen: Wissenschaft, Aberglaube und die Kraft der Phantasie, Rowohlt Verlag, 2. Auflage, Januar 2002, ISBN 3499613379. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel.
"Every generation has its Darwinian failures but every individual is descended only from previous generations’ successful minorities."
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998)

„Vererbung ist nicht das Gleiche wie Fortpflanzung. Es kann auch Fortpflanzung ohne Vererbung geben: Ein Waldbrand pflanzt sich fort, aber er vererbt nichts.“

Der entzauberte Regenbogen: Wissenschaft, Aberglaube und die Kraft der Phantasie, Rowohlt Verlag, 2. Auflage, Januar 2002, ISBN 3499613379. Übersetzer: Sebastian Vogel.
"Heredity is not the same thing as reproduction. You can have reproduction without heredity. Bush fires reproduce but without heredity."
Und es entsprang ein Fluss in Eden (River out of Eden, 1995), Der entzauberte Regenbogen (Unweaving the Rainbow, 1998)

Richard Dawkins: Zitate auf Englisch

“We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born.”

Richard Dawkins buch Der entzauberte Regenbogen

Dawkins has stated on many occasions that this passage will be read at his funeral.
Unweaving the Rainbow (1998)
Kontext: We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the sand grains of Sahara. Certainly those unborn ghosts include greater poets than Keats, scientists greater than Newton. We know this because the set of possible people allowed by our DNA so massively outnumbers the set of actual people. In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here. We privileged few, who won the lottery of birth against all odds, how dare we whine at our inevitable return to that prior state from which the vast majority have never stirred?

“No matter how much knowledge and wisdom you acquire during your life, not one jot will be passed on to your children by genetic means. Each new generation starts from scratch.”

Richard Dawkins buch The Selfish Gene

Quelle: The Selfish Gene (1976, 1989), Ch. 3. Immortal Coils
Kontext: Genes do indirectly control the manufacture of bodies, and the influence is strictly one way: acquired characteristics are not inherited. No matter how much knowledge and wisdom you acquire during your life, not one jot will be passed on to your children by genetic means. Each new generation starts from scratch.

“The first cause cannot have been an intelligence, let alone an intelligence that answers prayers and enjoys being worshiped.”

Intelligent, creative, complex, statistically improbable things come late into the universe, as the product of evolution or some other process of gradual escalation from simple beginnings. They come late into the universe and therefore cannot be responsible for designing it.
The Huffington Post, 23/10/2006 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-dawkins/why-there-almost-certainl_b_32164.html
Why There Almost Certainly Is No God (2006)

“The universe does not owe you a sense of hope.”

The Big Questions (2008)
Kontext: "The universe does not owe you a sense of hope. It could be that the world, the universe, is a totally hopeless place. I don't as a matter of fact think it is, but even if it were - that would not be a good reason for believing in God. You cannot say "I believe in X", whatever X is - God or anything else - "because that gives me hope". You have to say "I believe in X because there is some evidence for X". In the case of God - there is not a tiny shred of evidence for the existence of any kind of god.” … “There's plenty of reason for hope in a Godless world. The universe is a beautiful place. The world is a beautiful place. To understand it in a clear-eyed, open-eyed way; to look out at the world and to really understand why we exist, what it's all about - that is a hugely uplifting feeling; That really does give a sense of worth to life, even if life itself is finite, as I believe it is. Nevertheless, it is not a hopeless life without a god, and to re-divert to my earlier point, even if it were - then it's just illogical to say that that gives you evidence for the belief in God." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of-8Q3HySjE&t=44m08s

“However difficult those simple beginnings may be to accept, they are a whole lot easier to accept than complicated beginnings. Complicated things come into the universe late, as a consequence of slow, gradual, incremental steps. God, if he exists, would have to be a very, very, very complicated thing indeed. So to postulate a God as the beginning of the universe, as the answer to the riddle of the first cause, is to shoot yourself in the conceptual foot because you are immediately postulating something far far more complicated than that which you are trying to explain.”

Richard Dawkins buch Der Gotteswahn

The God Delusion (2006)
Kontext: If the alternative that's being offered to what physicists now talk about - a big bang, a spontaneous singularity which gave rise to the origin of the universe - if the alternative to that is a divine intelligence, a creator, which would have to have been complicated, statistically improbable, the very kind of thing which scientific theories such as Darwin's exists to explain, then immediately we see that however difficult and apparently inadequate the theory of the physicists is, the theory of the theologians - that the first course was a complicated intelligence - is even more difficult to accept. They're both difficult but the theory of the cosmic intelligence is even worse. What Darwinism does is to raise our consciousness to the power of science to explain the existence of complex things and intelligences, and creative intelligences are above all complex things, they're statistically improbable. Darwinism raises our consciousness to the power of science to explain how such entities - and the human brain is one - can come into existence from simple beginnings. However difficult those simple beginnings may be to accept, they are a whole lot easier to accept than complicated beginnings. Complicated things come into the universe late, as a consequence of slow, gradual, incremental steps. God, if he exists, would have to be a very, very, very complicated thing indeed. So to postulate a God as the beginning of the universe, as the answer to the riddle of the first cause, is to shoot yourself in the conceptual foot because you are immediately postulating something far far more complicated than that which you are trying to explain. Now, physicists cope with this problem in various ways, which may seem somewhat unconvincing. For example, they suggest that our universe is but one bubble in foam of universes, the multiverse, and each bubble in the foam has a different set of laws and constants. And by the anthropic principle we have to be - since we're here talking about it - in the kind of bubble, with the kind of laws and constants, which are capable of giving rise to the evolutionary process and therefore to creatures like us. That is one current physicists' explanation for how we exist in the kind of universe that we do. It doesn't sound so shatteringly convincing as say Darwin's own theory, which is self-evidently very convincing. Nevertheless, however unconvincing that may sound, it is many, many, many orders of magnitude more convincing than any theory that says complex intelligence was there right from the outset. If you have problems seeing how matter could just come into existence - try thinking about how complex intelligent matter, or complex intelligent entities of any kind, could suddenly spring into existence, it's many many orders of magnitude harder to understand.

Lynchburg, Virginia, 23/10/2006 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR_z85O0P2M&t=42m41s

“Evolution could so easily be disproved if just a single fossil turned up in the wrong date order. Evolution has passed this test with flying colours.”

Richard Dawkins buch The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

Quelle: The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

“It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).”

Quelle: Reviewing Blueprints: Solving the Mystery of Evolution (1989) by Maitland A. Edey and Donald C. Johanson

Quelle: Last sentence expanded upon in "Ignorance is No Crime" (2001) (see below)
Kontext: So to the book's provocation, the statement that nearly half the people in the United States don't believe in evolution. Not just any people but powerful people, people who should know better, people with too much influence over educational policy. We are not talking about Darwin's particular theory of natural selection. It is still (just) possible for a biologist to doubt its importance, and a few claim to. No, we are here talking about the fact of evolution itself, a fact that is proved utterly beyond reasonable doubt. To claim equal time for creation science in biology classes is about as sensible as to claim equal time for the flat-earth theory in astronomy classes. Or, as someone has pointed out, you might as well claim equal time in sex education classes for the stork theory. It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).

If that gives you offence, I'm sorry. You are probably not stupid, insane or wicked; and ignorance is no crime in a country with strong local traditions of interference in the freedom of biology educators to teach the central theorem of their subject.

“By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.”

The Enemies of Reason, "The Irrational Health Service" [1.02], 20 August 2007, timecode 00:13:05"ff"
The Enemies of Reason (August 2007)
Variante: We should be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brain falls out.

“Science replaces private prejudice with publicly verifiable evidence.”

The Enemies of Reason, "The Irrational Health Service"
The Enemies of Reason (August 2007)

“American political opportunities are loaded against those who are simultaneously intelligent and honest.”

Richard Dawkins on militant atheism http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism.html, (February 2002)
Kontext: We've reached a truly remarkable situation: a grotesque mismatch between the American intelligencia and the American electorate. A philosophical opinion about the nature of the universe which is held by the vast majority of top American scientists, and probably the majority of the intelligencia generally, is so abhorrent to the American electorate that no candidate for popular election dare affirm it in public. If I'm right, this means that high office in the greatest country in the world is barred to the very people best qualified to hold it: the intelligencia, unless they are prepared to lie about their beliefs. To put it bluntly American political opportunities are heavily loaded against those who are simultaneously intelligent and honest.

“Even if it were true that evolution, or the teaching of evolution, encouraged immorality that would not imply that the theory of evolution was false.”

Richard Dawkins buch The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

Quelle: The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

“DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music.”

Richard Dawkins buch Und es entsprang ein Fluß in Eden

Quelle: River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life

“In the beginning was simplicity.”

Richard Dawkins buch The Selfish Gene

Quelle: The Selfish Gene

Ähnliche Autoren

Jerome Klapka Jerome Foto
Jerome Klapka Jerome 2
englischer Autor
Norman Vincent Peale Foto
Norman Vincent Peale 7
US-amerikanischer Pfarrer und Autor
Jacques Prevért Foto
Jacques Prevért 2
französischer Autor, Dichter und Chansonnier (1900-1977)
Joseph Campbell Foto
Joseph Campbell 13
US-amerikanischer Mythenforscher, Professor und Autor
Orson Welles Foto
Orson Welles 22
US-amerikanischer Filmregisseur, Schauspieler und Autor
Tim Burton Foto
Tim Burton 6
US-amerikanischer Autor, Produzent und Filmregisseur
Lafayette Ronald Hubbard Foto
Lafayette Ronald Hubbard 2
amerikanischer Autor und Gründer von Scientology
Doris Lessing Foto
Doris Lessing 4
britische Schriftstellerin
William Golding Foto
William Golding 3
britischer Schriftsteller
Haruki Murakami Foto
Haruki Murakami 35
japanischer Autor