Martin Amis Zitate
seite 2

Martin Louis Amis ist ein englischer Schriftsteller. Amis’ Werke setzen sich mit den Exzessen der spätkapitalistischen westlichen Gesellschaften auseinander. Die von ihm erlebte Absurdität überspitzt er häufig in grotesker Karikatur. Die New York Times hat Amis als einen Meister der Neuen Widerwärtigkeit bezeichnet. Zu den Autoren, die Amis beeinflussten, zählen Saul Bellow, Vladimir Nabokov und James Joyce. Amis selber beeinflusste eine Reihe erfolgreicher britischer Autoren, darunter Will Self und Zadie Smith.Zu seinen bekanntesten Werken gehört der Roman Gierig und London Fields . Für seinen ersten Roman The Rachel Papers erhielt er den Somerset Maugham Award. Der Roman wurde unter dem Titel Er? Will! Sie Nicht? von Regisseur Damian Harris mit Dexter Fletcher in der Hauptrolle verfilmt. Für seine Erinnerungen Die Hauptsachen , in denen er sich unter anderem mit der Beziehung zu seinem berühmten Vater, dem Romancier Kingsley Amis auseinandersetzt, wurde er mit dem James Tait Black Memorial Prize ausgezeichnet. Zwei seiner Werke waren für den Booker Prize nominiert – 1991 der Roman Pfeil der Zeit und 2003 der Roman Yellow Dog. 2013 wurde Amis zum Mitglied der American Academy of Arts and Sciences gewählt. Von 2007 bis 2011 hatte er eine Professur für Kreatives Schreiben an der University of Manchester inne. Das US-amerikanische Magazine Time wählte 2005 seinen Roman Gierig zu den besten englischsprachigen Romanen, die zwischen 1923 und 2005 erschienen sind und die britische Zeitung The Times zählte ihn 2008 zu den 50 herausragendsten britischen Schriftstellern seit 1945.In Großbritannien ist Martin Amis auch einem nicht an Literatur interessierten Publikum bekannt: Klatschspalten der britischen Presse beschäftigten sich unter anderem mit dem schwierigen Verhältnis zu seinem Vater Kingsley Amis, der sich nach einer von Martin Amis selbst verbreiteten Anekdote weigerte, den Roman Gierig – immerhin eines seiner erfolgreichsten Werke – zu Ende zu lesen. Die kontroverse Streichung von London Fields von der Liste der Finalisten für den Booker Prize war nach Aussagen von Komitee-Mitglieds David Lodge darauf zurückzuführen, dass zwei Mitglieder des Auswahlkomitees die Darstellung der weiblichen Figuren dieses Romanes entschieden ablehnten. 2008 wurde bekannt, dass Amis für seine Lehrtätigkeit an der University of Manchester ein Jahresgehalt von 80.000 Britischen Pfund bezog – wie von mehreren Zeitungen kommentiert wurde, entsprach dies angesichts der Verpflichtung, 28 Stunden pro Jahr zu unterrichten, einem Stundenlohn von 3000 Britischen Pfund, eine Tatsache, die in einer Reihe von britischen Zeitungen aufgegriffen wurde. Die University of Manchester wehrte sich gegen die Vorwürfe mit dem Hinweis, dass Amis wie jedes andere Mitglied des Lehrkörpers der Universität weitaus mehr Verpflichtungen als reine Lehrtätigkeit hätte. Wikipedia  

✵ 25. August 1949   •   Andere Namen Martin Louis Amis
Martin Amis Foto
Martin Amis: 137   Zitate 0   Gefällt mir

Martin Amis Zitate und Sprüche

Martin Amis: Zitate auf Englisch

“Motion is extremely irritated by Larkin's extreme irritability. He's always complaining that Larkin is always complaining.”

"Political Correctness: Robert Bly and Philip Larkin" (1997)
Kontext: In Andrew Motion's book, we have the constant sense that Larkin is somehow falling short of the cloudless emotional health enjoyed by, for instance, Andrew Motion. Also the sense, as Motion invokes his like-minded contemporaries, that Larkin is being judged by a newer, cleaner, braver, saner world. … Motion is extremely irritated by Larkin's extreme irritability. He's always complaining that Larkin is always complaining.

“I think it's the whole impulse to judge and censor and euphemize, that is the enemy.”

"Political Correctness: Robert Bly and Philip Larkin" (1997)
Kontext: I think it's the whole impulse to judge and censor and euphemize, that is the enemy. … What fun, to feel superior to T. S. Eliot. And that's the impulse that I am suspicious of.

“Only it was much, much worse than that. In fact, words alone cannot adduce how much worse it was than that. September 11 was an attack on words: we felt a general deficit.”

"The world: an explanation" in The Daily Telegraph (8 March 2003) http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/custom?q=cache:hZVARej7mn0J:www.martinamisweb.com/documents/world_explanation.doc&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8&client=pub-4015880282924246
Kontext: What happened on September 11? On September 11 — what happened? Picture this: two upended matchboxes, knocked over by the sheer force of paper-darts.
Only it was much, much worse than that. In fact, words alone cannot adduce how much worse it was than that. September 11 was an attack on words: we felt a general deficit. And with words destroyed, we had to make do, we had to bolster truth with colons and repetition: not only repetition: but repetition and: colons. This is what we adduce.

“I think enlightenment is incremental, and I see it in my children.”

"Political Correctness: Robert Bly and Philip Larkin" (1997)
Kontext: I think enlightenment is incremental, and I see it in my children. I was six-years-old when I met a black person. My father tutored me and said, "We're going to meet two men who have black skin." And on the bus in Swansea on the way there, I accepted this and thought this would be no trouble for me. As it was, I went into the room and burst into tears and pointed at the man and said, "You've got a black face."
This wouldn't happen with my children. They've known, they've mingled with black people all their lives. This certainly is not going to occur. And so it goes on in this incremental way. … I think this is the only way it can be achieved. The trouble with proclaiming yourself to be cleansed of atavism is that it's not the case. It's an illusion. It's an illusion that can only be maintained by ideology and executive policing. It is forced consciousness. It's a lie to say, I have no racial feelings. Honesty and slow progress is a better policy, I think.

“For those thousands in the south tower, the second plane meant the end of everything. For us, its glint was the worldflash of a coming future.”

"Fear and loathing" (2001)
Kontext: For those thousands in the south tower, the second plane meant the end of everything. For us, its glint was the worldflash of a coming future.
Terrorism is political communication by other means. The message of September 11 ran as follows: America, it is time you learned how implacably you are hated. United Airlines Flight 175 was an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile aimed at her innocence. That innocence, it was here being claimed, was a luxurious and anachronistic delusion.

“It now seems that pornography is the leading sex educator in the Western world.”

Playboy interview (2003)
Kontext: It now seems that pornography is the leading sex educator in the Western world. And the idea of having your sexual nature determined by a medallion-in-the-chest-hair artist out in Los Angeles is really humiliating. I'm not talking about me, but I'm talking about my children's contemporaries, kids aged 18. They're getting their sex tips from some charlatan at Wicked Video.

“It was explained that the North Korean matter was a diplomatic inconvenience, while Iraq's non-disarmament remained a "crisis". The reason was strategic: even without WMDs, North Korea could inflict a million casualties on its southern neighbour and raze Seoul. Iraq couldn't manage anything on this scale, so you could attack it.”

"The Palace of the End" (2003)
Kontext: It was explained that the North Korean matter was a diplomatic inconvenience, while Iraq's non-disarmament remained a "crisis". The reason was strategic: even without WMDs, North Korea could inflict a million casualties on its southern neighbour and raze Seoul. Iraq couldn't manage anything on this scale, so you could attack it. North Korea could, so you couldn't. The imponderables of the proliferation age were becoming ponderable. Once a nation has done the risky and nauseous work of acquisition, it becomes unattackable. A single untested nuclear weapon may be a liability. But five or six constitute a deterrent. From this it crucially follows that we are going to war with Iraq because it doesn't have weapons of mass destruction. Or not many. The surest way by far of finding out what Iraq has is to attack it. Then at last we will have Saddam's full cooperation in our weapons inspection, because everything we know about him suggests that he will use them all. The Pentagon must be more or less convinced that Saddam's WMDs are under a certain critical number. Otherwise it couldn't attack him.

“And we're not going to do that.”

"Fear and loathing" (2001)
Kontext: Weirdly, the world suddenly feels bipolar. All over again the west confronts an irrationalist, agonistic, theocratic/ideocratic system which is essentially and unappeasably opposed to its existence. The old enemy was a superpower; the new enemy isn't even a state. In the end, the USSR was broken by its own contradictions and abnormalities, forced to realise, in Martin Malia's words, that "there is no such thing as socialism, and the Soviet Union built it". Then, too, socialism was a modernist, indeed a futurist, experiment, whereas militant fundamentalism is convulsed in a late-medieval phase of its evolution. We would have to sit through a renaissance and a reformation, and then await an enlightenment. And we're not going to do that.

“Much more recently I reclassified myself as an agnostic. Atheism, it turns out, is not quite rational either. The sketchiest acquaintance with cosmology will tell you that the universe is not, or is not yet, decipherable by human beings. It will also tell you that the universe is far more bizarre, prodigious and chillingly grand than any doctrine, and that spiritual needs can be met by its contemplation. Belief is otiose; reality is sufficiently awesome as it stands.”

"The voice of the lonely crowd" (2002)
Kontext: My apostasy, at the age of nine, was vehement. Clearly, I didn't want the shared words, the shared identity. I forswore chapel; those Bibles were scribbled on and otherwise desecrated, and two or three of them were taken into the back garden and quietly torched.
Later — we were now in Cambridge — I gave a school speech in which I rejected all belief as an affront to common sense. I was an atheist, and I was 12: it seemed open-and-shut. I had not pondered Kant's rather lenient remark about the crooked timber of humanity, out of which nothing straight is ever built. Nor was I aware that the soul had legitimate needs.
Much more recently I reclassified myself as an agnostic. Atheism, it turns out, is not quite rational either. The sketchiest acquaintance with cosmology will tell you that the universe is not, or is not yet, decipherable by human beings. It will also tell you that the universe is far more bizarre, prodigious and chillingly grand than any doctrine, and that spiritual needs can be met by its contemplation. Belief is otiose; reality is sufficiently awesome as it stands.

“Weirdly, the world suddenly feels bipolar. All over again the west confronts an irrationalist, agonistic, theocratic/ideocratic system which is essentially and unappeasably opposed to its existence.”

"Fear and loathing" (2001)
Kontext: Weirdly, the world suddenly feels bipolar. All over again the west confronts an irrationalist, agonistic, theocratic/ideocratic system which is essentially and unappeasably opposed to its existence. The old enemy was a superpower; the new enemy isn't even a state. In the end, the USSR was broken by its own contradictions and abnormalities, forced to realise, in Martin Malia's words, that "there is no such thing as socialism, and the Soviet Union built it". Then, too, socialism was a modernist, indeed a futurist, experiment, whereas militant fundamentalism is convulsed in a late-medieval phase of its evolution. We would have to sit through a renaissance and a reformation, and then await an enlightenment. And we're not going to do that.

“This wouldn't happen with my children. They've known, they've mingled with black people all their lives. This certainly is not going to occur. And so it goes on in this incremental way. … I think this is the only way it can be achieved. The trouble with proclaiming yourself to be cleansed of atavism is that it's not the case. It's an illusion. It's an illusion that can only be maintained by ideology and executive policing. It is forced consciousness. It's a lie to say, I have no racial feelings. Honesty and slow progress is a better policy, I think.”

"Political Correctness: Robert Bly and Philip Larkin" (1997)
Kontext: I think enlightenment is incremental, and I see it in my children. I was six-years-old when I met a black person. My father tutored me and said, "We're going to meet two men who have black skin." And on the bus in Swansea on the way there, I accepted this and thought this would be no trouble for me. As it was, I went into the room and burst into tears and pointed at the man and said, "You've got a black face."
This wouldn't happen with my children. They've known, they've mingled with black people all their lives. This certainly is not going to occur. And so it goes on in this incremental way. … I think this is the only way it can be achieved. The trouble with proclaiming yourself to be cleansed of atavism is that it's not the case. It's an illusion. It's an illusion that can only be maintained by ideology and executive policing. It is forced consciousness. It's a lie to say, I have no racial feelings. Honesty and slow progress is a better policy, I think.

“It is straightforward—and never mind, for now, about plagues and famines: if God existed, and if he cared for humankind, he would never have given us religion.”

"The voice of the lonely crowd" (2002)
Quelle: The Second Plane: 14 Responses to September 11
Kontext: The 20th century, with its scores of millions of supernumerary dead, has been called the age of ideology. And the age of ideology, clearly, was a mere hiatus in the age of religion, which shows no sign of expiry. Since it is no longer permissible to disparage any single faith or creed, let us start disparaging all of them. To be clear: an ideology is a belief system with an inadequate basis in reality; a religion is a belief system with no basis in reality whatever. Religious belief is without reason and without dignity, and its record is near-universally dreadful. It is straightforward — and never mind, for now, about plagues and famines: if God existed, and if He cared for humankind, He would never have given us religion.

Ähnliche Autoren

Gilbert Keith Chesterton Foto
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 83
englischer Schriftsteller
A.A. Milne Foto
A.A. Milne 10
englischer Schriftsteller
Romain Gary Foto
Romain Gary 2
französischer Schriftsteller
Terry Pratchett Foto
Terry Pratchett 148
englischer Fantasy-Schriftsteller
Clive Staples Lewis Foto
Clive Staples Lewis 107
irischer Schriftsteller und Literaturwissenschaftler
Jerome Klapka Jerome Foto
Jerome Klapka Jerome 2
englischer Autor
William Somerset Maugham Foto
William Somerset Maugham 5
englischer Dramatiker und Schriftsteller
Samuel Beckett Foto
Samuel Beckett 66
irischer Schriftsteller, Literaturnobelpreisträger
Stefan Zweig Foto
Stefan Zweig 53
österreichischer Schriftsteller
Maxim Gorki Foto
Maxim Gorki 5
russischer Schriftsteller