Zitate von Jeremy Bentham

Jeremy Bentham Foto
3  1

Jeremy Bentham

Geburtstag: 15. Februar 1748
Todesdatum: 6. Juni 1832

Werbung

Jeremy Bentham war ein englischer Jurist, Philosoph und Sozialreformer.

Bentham gilt als Begründer des klassischen Utilitarismus. Er war einer der wichtigsten Sozialreformer Englands im 19. Jahrhundert und ein Vordenker des modernen Wohlfahrtsstaats. Er forderte allgemeine Wahlen, das Frauenstimmrecht, die Abschaffung der Todesstrafe, Tierrechte, die Legalisierung der Homosexualität und die Pressefreiheit. Er gilt als Vordenker des Feminismus, als Vorkämpfer der Demokratie, des Liberalismus und des Rechtsstaats. Bentham ist aber auch bekannt für seine scharfe Kritik an der französischen Menschenrechtserklärung und sein Eintreten für Wucherzinsen. Auch lieferte er Argumente für einen legitimen Einsatz der Folter und entwickelte mit dem Panoptikum ein Modell-Gefängnis, das Michel Foucault als Symbol für die Überwachungs- und Herrschaftsstrukturen der modernen Zivilgesellschaft wählte.

Zitate Jeremy Bentham

Werbung

„Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure … There is no taste which deserves the epithet good, unless it be the taste for such employments which, to the pleasure actually produced by them, conjoin some contingent or future utility: there is no taste which deserves to be characterized as bad, unless it be a taste for some occupation which has mischievous tendency. Théorie des peines et des récompenses (1811); translation by Richard Smith, The Rationale of Reward, J. & H. L. Hunt, London, 1825, Bk. 3, Ch. 1

„He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them. There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy. An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation. Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society

„Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them. There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy. An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation. Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society

„Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think: every effort we can make to throw off our subjection, will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. In words a man may pretend to abjure their empire: but in reality he will remain subject to it all the while. The principle of utility recognizes this subjection, and assumes it for the foundation of that system, the object of which is to rear the fabric of felicity by the hands of reason and of law. Systems which attempt to question it, deal in sounds instead of sense, in caprice instead of reason, in darkness instead of light. Ch. 1 : Of the Principle of Utility

„That which has no existence cannot be destroyed — that which cannot be destroyed cannot require anything to preserve it from destruction. Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense — nonsense upon stilts.“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: That which has no existence cannot be destroyed — that which cannot be destroyed cannot require anything to preserve it from destruction. Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense — nonsense upon stilts. But this rhetorical nonsense ends in the old strain of mischievous nonsense for immediately a list of these pretended natural rights is given, and those are so expressed as to present to view legal rights. And of these rights, whatever they are, there is not, it seems, any one of which any government can, upon any occasion whatever, abrogate the smallest particle. A Critical Examination of the Declaration of Rights

Werbung

„The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny.“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: The day has been, I grieve to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer? Ch. 17 : Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence

„The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer?“

— Jeremy Bentham, The Principles of Morals and Legislation
Context: The day has been, I grieve to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer? Ch. 17 : Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence

„Create all the happiness you are able to create: remove all the misery you are able to remove.“

— Jeremy Bentham
Context: Create all the happiness you are able to create: remove all the misery you are able to remove. Every day will allow you to add something to the pleasure of others, or to diminish something of their pains. And for every grain of enjoyment you sow in the bosom of another, you shall find a harvest in your own bosom; while every sorrow which you pluck out from the thoughts and feelings of a fellow creature shall be replaced by beautiful peace and joy in the sanctuary of your soul. Advise to a young girl (22 June 1830)

Werbung

„No power of government ought to be employed in the endeavor to establish any system or article of belief on the subject of religion.“

— Jeremy Bentham, Constitutional Code; For the Use All Nations and All Governments Professing Liberal Opinions Volume 1

„Want keeps pace with dignity. Destitute of the lawful means of supporting his rank, his dignity presents a motive for malversation, and his power furnishes the means.“

— Jeremy Bentham
[http://books.google.com/books?id=W2lYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA246&dq=malversation&hl=en&ei=TQlHTKuqHYfJnAespJjOBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=28&ved=0CKsBEOgBMBs4ZA#v=onepage&q=malversation&f=false The Rationale of Reward (1811)]

Nächster
Die heutige Jubiläen
Paul Sethe3
deutscher Publizist, Journalist und Geisteswissenschaftler 1901 - 1967
Max Raabe Foto
Max Raabe4
deutscher Sänger 1962
Theodor Heuss Foto
Theodor Heuss9
ehemaliger Bundespräsident der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1884 - 1963
Douglas Fairbanks sen. Foto
Douglas Fairbanks sen.1
US-amerikanischer Schauspieler 1883 - 1939
Weitere 7 heute Jubiläen
Ähnliche Autoren
Georges Ohsawa Foto
Georges Ohsawa2
japanischer Philosoph, Gründer der makrobiotischen Ernähr...
Thomas Hobbes Foto
Thomas Hobbes11
englischer Mathematiker, Staatstheoretiker und Philosoph
John Locke Foto
John Locke10
englischer Philosoph und Vordenker der Aufklärung
Max Stirner Foto
Max Stirner32
deutscher Philosoph
Henrich Steffens Foto
Henrich Steffens7
norwegisch-deutscher Philosoph, Naturforscher und Dichter
Khalil Gibran Foto
Khalil Gibran14
libanesischer Künstler und Dichter
Henry David Thoreau Foto
Henry David Thoreau53
US-amerikanischer Schriftsteller und Philosoph (1817-1862)
William McDougall Foto
William McDougall6
englisch-amerikanischer Psychologe
Herbert Marcuse Foto
Herbert Marcuse10
deutsch-amerikanischer Philosoph und Soziologe
Johann Kaspar Lavater Foto
Johann Kaspar Lavater2
Schweizer Pfarrer, Philosoph und Schriftsteller