Henry Pemberton Zitate

Henry Pemberton war ein englischer Arzt, Mathematiker und Physiker. 1728 wurde er als Nachfolger von John Woodward Professor für Medizin am Gresham College in London.

Pemberton studierte ab 1714 Medizin an der Universität Leiden, unter anderem bei Herman Boerhaave, und in Paris, wo er Anatomie studierte. Daneben studierte er auch Mathematik, womit er schon auf der Schule durch das Studium von Apollonius in der Ausgabe von Halley begann und wofür er Bücher aus der Bibliothek des verstorbenen Abbé Jean Gallois in Paris erwarb. Nach der Rückkehr nach London um 1715 war er zur weiteren Ausbildung am St. Thomas Hospital und promovierte danach 1719 an der Universität Leiden bei Boerhaave. In seiner Dissertation behandelte er die Anpassung des Auges an verschiedene Entfernungen, was er korrekt auf eine Formänderung der Linse durch Muskelkraft zurückführte. Nach Richard Westfall war das sein bedeutendster eigenständiger wissenschaftlicher Beitrag.

Nach der Rückkehr nach London praktizierte er aber nur selten als Arzt, da seine Gesundheit dies nicht zuließ. Stattdessen nahm er Kontakt zu führenden Naturwissenschaftlern und insbesondere zu Isaac Newton auf, publizierte zu den verschiedensten Themen zum Beispiel in den Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Er erwarb sich einen Ruf mit medizinischen Publikationen, so dass er 1728 Professor für Medizin am Gresham College wurde, wo er auch Vorlesungen über Chemie hielt, die postum 1771 von seinem Freund James Wilson veröffentlicht wurden, ebenso wie seine Vorlesungen über Physiologie 1779. Er brachte auch eine neue verbesserte Ausgabe des Arzneimittelhandbuchs des Royal College of Physicians heraus , womit er 1739 bis 1746 beschäftigt war.

Pemberton unterstützte Newton ab 1723 in der Vorbereitung der dritten Auflage von dessen Principia Mathematica und veröffentlichte ein populärwissenschaftliches Buch über dessen physikalische Lehre . Die dritte Auflage der Principia war die Ausgabe letzter Hand, sie brachte aber keine wesentlichen Änderungen gegenüber der zweiten Auflage, die von Roger Cotes herausgegeben wurde, einem bedeutenden Mathematiker, an dessen Fähigkeiten Pemberton nicht heranreichte. Da Pemberton aber in den letzten Lebensjahren Newtons viel mit diesem in Kontakt war und mit Newton eng befreundet war, haben seine Schriften über Newton eine besondere Authentizität. Pemberton Freundschaft mit Newton begann, als er einen Beweis von Giovanni Poleni über die Formel von Leibniz für die kinetische Energie kritisierte . Pemberton brachte darin gleichzeitig überschwänglich seine Bewunderung für Newton zum Ausdruck, was Newtons Wohlwollen fand, als sein Leibarzt Richard Mead ihm den Aufsatz zur Kenntnis brachte. Für Mead bearbeitete Pemberton auch die Neuauflage der Myotomia Reformata von William Cowper .

Pemberton plante auch eine englische Übersetzung der Principia und einen Kommentar, hier kam ihm aber Andrew Motte zuvor und er gab seine Pläne auf.

Er förderte den Ingenieur Benjamin Robins, dessen mathematisches Talent ihm auffiel.

Seit 1720 war Pemberton Fellow der Royal Society und seit 1746 auswärtiges Mitglied der Königlich Preußischen Sozietät der Wissenschaften. Wikipedia  

✵ 1694 – 9. März 1771
Henry Pemberton: 4   Zitate 0   Gefällt mir

Henry Pemberton: Zitate auf Englisch

“When I had the honour of his conversation, I endeavoured to learn his thoughts upon mathematical subjects, and something historical concerning his inventions, that I had not been before acquainted with. I found, he had read fewer of the modern mathematicians, than one could have expected; but his own prodigious invention readily supplied him with what he might have an occasion for in the pursuit of any subject he undertook. I have often heard him censure the handling geometrical subjects by algebraic calculations; and his book of Algebra he called by the name of Universal Arithmetic, in opposition to the injudicious title of Geometry, which Des Cartes had given to the treatise, wherein he shews, how the geometer may assist his invention by such kind of computations. He frequently praised Slusius, Barrow and Huygens for not being influenced by the false taste, which then began to prevail. He used to commend the laudable attempt of Hugo de Omerique to restore the ancient analysis, and very much esteemed Apollonius's book De sectione rationis for giving us a clearer notion of that analysis than we had before.”

Preface; The bold passage is subject of the 1809 article " Remarks on a Passage in Castillione's Life' of Sir Isaac Newton http://books.google.com/books?id=BS1WAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA519." By John Winthrop, in: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, from Their Commencement, in 1665, to the Year 1800: 1770-1776: 1770-1776. Charles Hutton et al. eds. (1809) p. 519.
Preface to View of Newton's Philosophy, (1728)

“If so, her motion must be influenced by it; perhaps she is retained in her orbit thereby. However, though the power of gravity is not sensibly weakened in the little change of distance, at which we can place ourselves from the centre of the earth, yet it is very possible that, so high as the moon, this power may differ much in strength from what it is here. To make an estimate what might be the degree of this diminution, he considered with himself that, if the moon be retained in her orbit by the force of gravity, no doubt the primary planets are carried round the sun by the like power. And, by comparing the periods of the several planets with their distances from the sun, he found that if any power like gravity held them in their courses, its strength must decrease in the duplicate proportion of the increase of distance. This he concluded by supposing them to move in perfect circles concentrical to the sun, from which the orbits of the greatest part of them do not much differ. Supposing therefore the power of gravity, when extended to the moon, to decrease in the same manner, he computed whether that force would be sufficient to keep the moon in her orbit. In this computation, being absent from books, he took the common estimate, in use among geographers and our seamen before Norwood had measured the earth, that 60 English miles were contained in one degree of latitude on the surface of the earth. But as this is a very faulty supposition, each degree containing about 691/2 of our miles, his computation did not answer expectation; whence he concluded, that some other cause must at least join with the action of the power of gravity on the moon. On this account he laid aside, for that time, any farther thoughts upon this matter.”

Republished in: Stephen Peter Rigaud (1838) Historical Essay on the First Publication of Sir Newton's Principia http://books.google.com/books?id=uvMGAAAAcAAJ&pg=RA1-PA49. p. 50-51
Preface to View of Newton's Philosophy, (1728)

“But some years after, a letter, which he received from Dr. Hooke, put him on inquiring what was the real figure, in which a body let fall from any high place descends, taking the motion of the earth round its axis into consideration. Such a body, having the same motion, which by the revolution of the earth the place has whence it falls, is to be considered as projected forward and at the same time drawn down to the centre of the earth. This gave occasion to his resuming his former thoughts concerning the moon, and Picard in France having lately measured the earth, by using his measures the moon appeared to be kept in her orbit purely by the power of gravity; and consequently, that this power decreases, as you recede from the centre of the earth, in the manner our author had formerly conjectured. Upon this principle he found the line described by a falling body to be an ellipsis, the centie of the earth being one focus. And the primary planets moving in such orbits round the sun, he had the satisfaction to see, that this inquiry, which he had undertaken merely out of curiosity, could be applied to the greatest purposes. Hereupon he composed near a dozen propositions, relating to the motion of the primary planets about the sun. Several years after this, some discourse he had with Dr. Halley, who at Cambridge made him a visit, engaged Sir Isaac Newton to resume again the consideration of this subject; and gave occasion to his writing the treatise, which he published under the title of Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. This treatise, full of such a variety of profound inventions, was composed by him, from scarce any other materials than the few propositions before mentioned, in the space of a year and a half.”

Republished in: Stephen Peter Rigaud (1838) Historical Essay on the First Publication of Sir Newton's Principia http://books.google.com/books?id=uvMGAAAAcAAJ&pg=RA1-PA49. p. 519
Preface to View of Newton's Philosophy, (1728)

Ähnliche Autoren

René Descartes Foto
René Descartes 45
französischer Philosoph, Mathematiker und Naturwissenschaft…
Thomas Hobbes Foto
Thomas Hobbes 80
englischer Mathematiker, Staatstheoretiker und Philosoph
Francis Bacon Foto
Francis Bacon 89
englischer Philosoph, Staatsmann und Naturwissenschaftler
Samuel Butler d.Ä. Foto
Samuel Butler d.Ä. 4
englischer Dichter
Benjamin Franklin Foto
Benjamin Franklin 99
amerikanischer Drucker, Verleger, Schriftsteller, Naturwiss…
Daniel Defoe Foto
Daniel Defoe 10
englischer Schriftsteller und Journalist
John Donne Foto
John Donne 4
englischer Schriftsteller
Galileo Galilei Foto
Galileo Galilei 10
italienischer Philosoph, Mathematiker, Physiker und Astronom
Joseph Addison Foto
Joseph Addison 7
englischer Dichter, Politiker und Journalist
Alexander Pope Foto
Alexander Pope 14
englischer Dichter, Übersetzer und Schriftsteller