Zitate von Max Born

Max Born Foto
2   0

Max Born

Geburtstag: 11. Dezember 1882
Todesdatum: 5. Januar 1970
Andere Namen:మాక్స్ బార్న్

Werbung

Max Born war ein deutscher Mathematiker und Physiker. Für grundlegende Beiträge zur Quantenmechanik wurde er 1954 mit dem Nobelpreis für Physik ausgezeichnet.

Ähnliche Autoren

 Archimedes Foto
Archimedes2
antiker griechischer Mathematiker, Physiker und Ingenieur
Hans-Peter Dürr Foto
Hans-Peter Dürr2
deutscher Physiker
Max Planck Foto
Max Planck8
deutscher Physiker
Harald Lesch Foto
Harald Lesch6
deutscher Astrophysiker, Fernsehmoderator und Professor
Erwin Schrödinger Foto
Erwin Schrödinger6
österreichischer Physiker und Wissenschaftstheoretiker
 Demokrit Foto
Demokrit15
griechischer Philosoph
James Clerk Maxwell Foto
James Clerk Maxwell1
schottischer Physiker
Albert Einstein Foto
Albert Einstein95
theoretischer Physiker
Nikola Tesla Foto
Nikola Tesla5
Erfinder und Physiker

Zitate Max Born

„Die Quanten sind doch eine hoffnungslose Schweinerei!“

—  Max Born
Albert Einstein und Max Born: Briefwechsel 1916 bis 1955, Rowohlt, Reinbeck bei Hamburg, 1969, S. 34

„Ein materieller Stab ist physikalisch nicht ein räumliches Ding, sondern durchaus ein raum-zeitliches Gebilde.“

—  Max Born
über die Relativitätstheorie, "Die Relativitätstheorie Einsteins", Springer 1969, ISBN 3-540-04540-6, S. 218

Werbung

„I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy.“

—  Max Born
Context: I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy. It has revolutionized fundamental concepts, e. g., about space and time (relativity), about causality (quantum theory), and about substance and matter (atomistics). It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics. Statement of 1963, as quoted in Schrodinger : Life and Thought (1992) by Walter J. Moore, p. 1

„Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects.“

—  Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html

„The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road.“

—  Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html

„What can we scientists do in this conflict? We can join the spiritual, religious, philosophical forces, which reject war on ethical grounds. We can even attack the ideological foundations of the conflict itself. For science is not only the basis of technology but also the material for a sound philosophy.“

—  Max Born
Context: America has grown by expansion in a practical vacuum; the pioneers of the West had to overcome terrific natural obstacles, but negligible human resistance. The Russia of today had to conquer not only natural but human difficulties: she had to break up the rotten system of the Czars and to assimilate backward Asiatic tribes; now she has set herself the task of bringing her brand of modernization to the ancient civilizations of the Far East. For this purpose it is indispensable to have a well-defined doctrine full of slogans, which appeals to the needs and instincts of the poverty-stricken masses. Thus one understands the power which Marx's philosophy has gained in the East. What can we scientists do in this conflict? We can join the spiritual, religious, philosophical forces, which reject war on ethical grounds. We can even attack the ideological foundations of the conflict itself. For science is not only the basis of technology but also the material for a sound philosophy.

„There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless.“

—  Max Born
Context: There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless. For, as I have repeatedly said, they are "beyond physics" indeed and demand an act of faith. We have to accept this fact to be honest. There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method." p. 209

„There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method."“

—  Max Born
Context: There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless. For, as I have repeatedly said, they are "beyond physics" indeed and demand an act of faith. We have to accept this fact to be honest. There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method." p. 209

Werbung

„The scientist's urge to investigate, like the faith of the devout or the inspiration of the artist, is an expression of mankind's longing for something fixed, something at rest in the universal whirl: God, Beauty, Truth.“

—  Max Born
Context: The scientist's urge to investigate, like the faith of the devout or the inspiration of the artist, is an expression of mankind's longing for something fixed, something at rest in the universal whirl: God, Beauty, Truth. Truth is what the scientist aims at. He finds nothing at rest, nothing enduring, in the universe. Not everything is knowable, still less predictable. But the mind of man is capable of grasping and understanding at least a part of Creation; amid the flight of phenomena stands the immutable pole of law. Conclusion

„The dance of atoms, electrons and nuclei, which in all its fury is subject to God's eternal laws, has been entangled with“

—  Max Born
Context: The dance of atoms, electrons and nuclei, which in all its fury is subject to God's eternal laws, has been entangled with another restless Universe which may well be the Devil's: the human struggle for power and domination, which eventually becomes history. My optimistic enthusiasm about the disinterested search for truth has been severely shaken. I wonder at my simplemindedness when I re-read what I said on the modern fulfilment of the alchemists dream: "Now however, the motive is not the lust for gold, cloaked by the mystery of magic arts, but the scientists' pure curiosity. For it is clear from the beginning that we may not expect wealth too." Gold means power, power to rule and to have a big share in the riches of this world. Modern alchemy is even a short-cut to this end, it provides power directly; a power to dominate and to threaten and hurt on a scale never heard of before. And this power we have actually seen displayed in ruthless acts of warfare, in the devastation of whole cities and the destruction of their population. From the Postcrip to 'The restless universe' (1951), pp. 225-226

„Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant.“

—  Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html

„Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe?
The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy.“

—  Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html

Werbung

„I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science, with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle and find our way by trial and error, building our road behind us as we proceed.“

—  Max Born
Context: I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science, with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle and find our way by trial and error, building our road behind us as we proceed. We do not find signposts at crossroads, but our own scouts erect them, to help the rest. Experiment and Theory in Physics (1943), p. 44

„It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics.“

—  Max Born
Context: I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy. It has revolutionized fundamental concepts, e. g., about space and time (relativity), about causality (quantum theory), and about substance and matter (atomistics). It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics. Statement of 1963, as quoted in Schrodinger : Life and Thought (1992) by Walter J. Moore, p. 1

Folgend
Die heutige Jubiläen
Malcolm X Foto
Malcolm X9
US-amerikanischer Führer der Bürgerrechtsbewegung 1925 - 1965
Ho Chi Minh Foto
Ho Chi Minh1
vietnamesischer Revolutionär und Staatsmann 1890 - 1969
Jacques Ellul Foto
Jacques Ellul
französischer Soziologe und Theologe 1912 - 1994
Charles Ives Foto
Charles Ives
US-amerikanischer Komponist 1874 - 1954
Weitere 69 heute Jubiläen
Ähnliche Autoren
 Archimedes Foto
Archimedes2
antiker griechischer Mathematiker, Physiker und Ingenieur
Hans-Peter Dürr Foto
Hans-Peter Dürr2
deutscher Physiker
Max Planck Foto
Max Planck8
deutscher Physiker
Harald Lesch Foto
Harald Lesch6
deutscher Astrophysiker, Fernsehmoderator und Professor
Erwin Schrödinger Foto
Erwin Schrödinger6
österreichischer Physiker und Wissenschaftstheoretiker