“Preserving power, rather than increasing it, is the main goal of states.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 20
John Joseph Mearsheimer ist ein US-amerikanischer Politikwissenschaftler an der University of Chicago. Er befasst sich hauptsächlich mit Internationalen Beziehungen. 2001 wurde er mit seinem Buch über offensiven Neorealismus bekannt, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Mearsheimer ist zusammen mit Stephen Walt Autor des New York Times Bestsellers The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy . Seine Veröffentlichung von 2011 Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics kategorisiert die „Lügen, die Staaten einander erzählen“ Nach einem Interview mit Mearsheimer in The Boston Globe ist die Lehre des Buchs „Lüge selektiv, lüge gut und mach deine Sache so gut du kannst.“ Wikipedia
“Preserving power, rather than increasing it, is the main goal of states.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 20
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 2
Preface, p. xi
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001)
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 6, Great Powers in Action, p. 211
“Decapitation is a fanciful strategy.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 109
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 361
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 15
Why China Cannot Rise Peacefully, http://cips.uottawa.ca/event/why-china-cannot-rise-peacefully/
“In the anarchic world of international politics, it is better to be Godzilla than Bambi.”
"China's Unpeaceful Rise", Current History (2006) vol. 105 (690) p. 162
“Bandwagoning is a strategy for the weak.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 163
“A state's potential power is based on the size of its population and the level of its wealth.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 2, Anarchy and the Struggle for Power, p. 43
“In an ideal world, where there are only good states, power would be largely irrelevant.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 1, Introduction, p. 16
“States have two kinds of power: latent power and military power.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 3, Wealth and Power, p. 55
“China, in short has the potential to be considerably more powerful than even the United States.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 398
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 6, Great Powers in Action, p. 202
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 269
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 293
John Mearsheimer on America Unhinged https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwqqzh59sVo provided by the Center for the National Interest. Here Mearsheimer is speaking about the Syrian conflict and potential United States intervention due to the Assad's regime alleged usage of chemical devices.
“The most dangerous states in the international system are continental powers with large armies.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 135
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 385
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 7, The Offshore Balancers, p. 252
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 9, The Causes of Great Power War, p. 337
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 84
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 4, The Primacy of Land Power, p. 99
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 144
“Important benefits often accrue to states that behave in an unexpected way.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 166
“Simply put, the most powerful state is the one that prevails in a dispute.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 3, Wealth and Power, p. 57
“States care about relative wealth, because economic might is the foundation of military might.”
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 5, Strategies for Survival, p. 143
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 10, Great Power Politics in the Twenty First Century, p. 371
Quelle: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2001), Chapter 8, Balancing versus Buck-Passing, p. 307