Zitate von Abdullah Öcalan

Abdullah Öcalan Foto
0   0

Abdullah Öcalan

Geburtstag: 4. April 1949

Abdullah Öcalan ist ein in lebenslanger Haft sitzender Führer und Gründungsmitglied der unter anderem in den USA, in den Staaten der EU und der Türkei als Terrororganisation eingestuften PKK, deren Vorsitzender er von ihrer Gründung 1978 bis zu ihrer Umbenennung 2002 war.

Laut Gründungsvertrag der jüngsten aus der PKK hervorgegangenen Organisation, der KCK, obliegt Öcalan weiterhin die Führung. Er wird daher von seinen Anhängern „Serok“ genannt und genießt bei diesen eine kultartige Verehrung.

Zitate Abdullah Öcalan

„The democratic system is at least as important as scientific and technological superiority. Feeding off each other, they both became strong and achieved the status of world civilisation.“

—  Abdullah Öcalan
Context: Every ideology and mode of belief can, if true, implement itself by using the resources of technology and above all those of the media without having to resort to violence. In other words, violence has become unnecessary. In fact things have got to the point where violence cannot be afforded. The rich variety of institutions and practices the democratic system offers is built on this social and scientific-technological development, and whatever problem it tackles, it offers a certain solution. It itself is the solution. To go through the examples, the solution to religious wars is secularism. Here the standard and the implementation involve taking the approach that everyone is free to follow their religious beliefs and democratic criteria will apply to all of them. Democracy offers definite freedom of belief and this is the antidote to religious wars. Again the same applies to the fields of thought and ideology. There is freedom of thought and conviction. It is allowed to work as one wants and implement one's beliefs as long as one does not infringe the rights of others in this respect. This also applies to political ideas and their expression in the form of parties. As long as it adheres to the democratic system and its state structure, every party can offer a solution without resorting to violence. There is no question here of either imposing a religion by force or breaking and shattering the structure of the state. Religion, thought and the parties based on them know to meet the standards of the democratic system of the state because they are based on them. If they don't know how to do this, then democracy gets the right to defend itself. It is clear here that regardless of the social group they are based on (which might be a nation or an ethnic or religious group), beliefs, ideas and the parties through which they are expressed cannot, in the name of these beliefs and ideas, force the limits on which the state is based. There is no need for this, because it will render the problem they claim to be solving even worse. Consequently, there is no need for it, and, in any case, there are solutions within the system. These are the democratic rights of those groups. They are their freedoms of belief and thought. They are the parties. They are all types of coalitions. In the area of language and culture, the democratic solution is even more striking. This is the area where the greatest successes have been achieved. Because the intermingling of language and culture, these values that many national groups have assimilated together for centuries, do not want to separate and get weak and monotonous, but prefer to stay together to get enriched and achieve variety, strength and life. And the school and laboratory for this is democracy and its implementation with conviction. Democracy is almost a garden of language and culture. The most developed and powerful principles of our day once again express this clearly. All European countries and North America are clear proofs of it. The attempt to suppress new religious, linguistic, cultural, intellectual and political developments during past centuries was the cause of all major wars, and resistance against suppression gave to wars which could be seen as understandable. Particularly in European countries this experience led to the development of a determined democracy in the wake of all these wars and led to the supremacy of the West. Western civilisation can, in this sense, be termed democratic civilisation. The democratic system is at least as important as scientific and technological superiority. Feeding off each other, they both became strong and achieved the status of world civilisation. Translation of his defense testimony at his 1999 trial http://web.archive.org/20020203190623/www.geocities.com/kurdifi/ocelan.html.

„As long as it adheres to the democratic system and its state structure, every party can offer a solution without resorting to violence. There is no question here of either imposing a religion by force or breaking and shattering the structure of the state.“

—  Abdullah Öcalan
Context: Every ideology and mode of belief can, if true, implement itself by using the resources of technology and above all those of the media without having to resort to violence. In other words, violence has become unnecessary. In fact things have got to the point where violence cannot be afforded. The rich variety of institutions and practices the democratic system offers is built on this social and scientific-technological development, and whatever problem it tackles, it offers a certain solution. It itself is the solution. To go through the examples, the solution to religious wars is secularism. Here the standard and the implementation involve taking the approach that everyone is free to follow their religious beliefs and democratic criteria will apply to all of them. Democracy offers definite freedom of belief and this is the antidote to religious wars. Again the same applies to the fields of thought and ideology. There is freedom of thought and conviction. It is allowed to work as one wants and implement one's beliefs as long as one does not infringe the rights of others in this respect. This also applies to political ideas and their expression in the form of parties. As long as it adheres to the democratic system and its state structure, every party can offer a solution without resorting to violence. There is no question here of either imposing a religion by force or breaking and shattering the structure of the state. Religion, thought and the parties based on them know to meet the standards of the democratic system of the state because they are based on them. If they don't know how to do this, then democracy gets the right to defend itself. It is clear here that regardless of the social group they are based on (which might be a nation or an ethnic or religious group), beliefs, ideas and the parties through which they are expressed cannot, in the name of these beliefs and ideas, force the limits on which the state is based. There is no need for this, because it will render the problem they claim to be solving even worse. Consequently, there is no need for it, and, in any case, there are solutions within the system. These are the democratic rights of those groups. They are their freedoms of belief and thought. They are the parties. They are all types of coalitions. In the area of language and culture, the democratic solution is even more striking. This is the area where the greatest successes have been achieved. Because the intermingling of language and culture, these values that many national groups have assimilated together for centuries, do not want to separate and get weak and monotonous, but prefer to stay together to get enriched and achieve variety, strength and life. And the school and laboratory for this is democracy and its implementation with conviction. Democracy is almost a garden of language and culture. The most developed and powerful principles of our day once again express this clearly. All European countries and North America are clear proofs of it. The attempt to suppress new religious, linguistic, cultural, intellectual and political developments during past centuries was the cause of all major wars, and resistance against suppression gave to wars which could be seen as understandable. Particularly in European countries this experience led to the development of a determined democracy in the wake of all these wars and led to the supremacy of the West. Western civilisation can, in this sense, be termed democratic civilisation. The democratic system is at least as important as scientific and technological superiority. Feeding off each other, they both became strong and achieved the status of world civilisation. Translation of his defense testimony at his 1999 trial http://web.archive.org/20020203190623/www.geocities.com/kurdifi/ocelan.html.

„Every ideology and mode of belief can, if true, implement itself by using the resources of technology and above all those of the media without having to resort to violence. In other words, violence has become unnecessary. In fact things have got to the point where violence cannot be afforded.“

—  Abdullah Öcalan
Context: Every ideology and mode of belief can, if true, implement itself by using the resources of technology and above all those of the media without having to resort to violence. In other words, violence has become unnecessary. In fact things have got to the point where violence cannot be afforded. The rich variety of institutions and practices the democratic system offers is built on this social and scientific-technological development, and whatever problem it tackles, it offers a certain solution. It itself is the solution. To go through the examples, the solution to religious wars is secularism. Here the standard and the implementation involve taking the approach that everyone is free to follow their religious beliefs and democratic criteria will apply to all of them. Democracy offers definite freedom of belief and this is the antidote to religious wars. Again the same applies to the fields of thought and ideology. There is freedom of thought and conviction. It is allowed to work as one wants and implement one's beliefs as long as one does not infringe the rights of others in this respect. This also applies to political ideas and their expression in the form of parties. As long as it adheres to the democratic system and its state structure, every party can offer a solution without resorting to violence. There is no question here of either imposing a religion by force or breaking and shattering the structure of the state. Religion, thought and the parties based on them know to meet the standards of the democratic system of the state because they are based on them. If they don't know how to do this, then democracy gets the right to defend itself. It is clear here that regardless of the social group they are based on (which might be a nation or an ethnic or religious group), beliefs, ideas and the parties through which they are expressed cannot, in the name of these beliefs and ideas, force the limits on which the state is based. There is no need for this, because it will render the problem they claim to be solving even worse. Consequently, there is no need for it, and, in any case, there are solutions within the system. These are the democratic rights of those groups. They are their freedoms of belief and thought. They are the parties. They are all types of coalitions. In the area of language and culture, the democratic solution is even more striking. This is the area where the greatest successes have been achieved. Because the intermingling of language and culture, these values that many national groups have assimilated together for centuries, do not want to separate and get weak and monotonous, but prefer to stay together to get enriched and achieve variety, strength and life. And the school and laboratory for this is democracy and its implementation with conviction. Democracy is almost a garden of language and culture. The most developed and powerful principles of our day once again express this clearly. All European countries and North America are clear proofs of it. The attempt to suppress new religious, linguistic, cultural, intellectual and political developments during past centuries was the cause of all major wars, and resistance against suppression gave to wars which could be seen as understandable. Particularly in European countries this experience led to the development of a determined democracy in the wake of all these wars and led to the supremacy of the West. Western civilisation can, in this sense, be termed democratic civilisation. The democratic system is at least as important as scientific and technological superiority. Feeding off each other, they both became strong and achieved the status of world civilisation. Translation of his defense testimony at his 1999 trial http://web.archive.org/20020203190623/www.geocities.com/kurdifi/ocelan.html.

„The social subjugation of woman was the vilest counter-revolution ever carried out.“

—  Abdullah Öcalan
The Political Thought of Abdullah Ocalan (2017), Liberating Life: Women's Revolution

„States only administrate, while democracies govern.“

—  Abdullah Öcalan
The Political Thought of Abdullah Ocalan (2017), Democratic Confederalism, p. 39

Help us translate English quotes

Discover interesting quotes and translate them.

Start translating

Ähnliche Autoren

Malcolm X Foto
Malcolm X35
US-amerikanischer Führer der Bürgerrechtsbewegung
Fidel Castro Foto
Fidel Castro11
ehemaliger kubanischer Staatspräsident
Václav Klaus Foto
Václav Klaus3
tschechischer Wirtschaftswissenschaftler und Ministerpräsid…
Desmond Tutu Foto
Desmond Tutu11
südafrikanischer Bischof und Friedensnobelpreisträger
Dan Millman Foto
Dan Millman8
US-amerikanischer Sportler und Autor von dem New Age zugesc…
Margaret Thatcher Foto
Margaret Thatcher38
Premierministerin des Vereinigten Königreichs
Josef Stalin Foto
Josef Stalin47
sowjetischer Politiker
Lenin Foto
Lenin25
russischer Revolutionär und Politiker
Benito Mussolini Foto
Benito Mussolini4
italienischer Politiker und Ministerpräsident des Königreic…
Uli Hoeneß Foto
Uli Hoeneß5
ehemaliger deutscher Fußballspieler, Fußballmanager, Verein…
Heutige Jubiläen
Nicolas Chamfort Foto
Nicolas Chamfort29
französischer Schriftsteller 1741 - 1794
Kurt Georg Kiesinger Foto
Kurt Georg Kiesinger2
Bundeskanzler der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1904 - 1988
Emanuel Geibel Foto
Emanuel Geibel15
deutscher Lyriker 1815 - 1884
Isaac Asimov Foto
Isaac Asimov18
US-amerikanischer Biochemiker und Science-Fiction-Schriftst… 1920 - 1992
Weitere 56 heutige Jubiläen
Ähnliche Autoren
Malcolm X Foto
Malcolm X35
US-amerikanischer Führer der Bürgerrechtsbewegung
Fidel Castro Foto
Fidel Castro11
ehemaliger kubanischer Staatspräsident
Václav Klaus Foto
Václav Klaus3
tschechischer Wirtschaftswissenschaftler und Ministerpräsid…
Desmond Tutu Foto
Desmond Tutu11
südafrikanischer Bischof und Friedensnobelpreisträger
Dan Millman Foto
Dan Millman8
US-amerikanischer Sportler und Autor von dem New Age zugesc…
x