Brian Arthur Zitate

William Brian Arthur ist ein britischer Ökonom, Professor am Santa Fe Institute und Gastforscher am Intelligent Systems Lab . Ein Schwerpunkt seiner Forschungen sind Komplexe Adaptive Systeme. Wikipedia  

✵ 21. Juli 1946
Brian Arthur Foto
Brian Arthur: 16 Zitate0 Gefällt mir

Brian Arthur: Zitate auf Englisch

“As we begin to understand complex systems, we begin to understand that we’re part of an ever-changing, interlocking, non-linear, kaleidoscopic world.”

W. Brian Arthur

W. Brian Arthur in: Mitchell M. Waldrop (2004) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos http://books.google.nl/books?id=VP9TWZtVvq8C&pg=PA333. p. 333

“Complexity is looking at interacting elements and asking how they form patterns and how the patterns unfold. It’s important to point out that the patterns may never be finished. They’re open-ended. In standard science this hit some things that most scientists have a negative reaction to. Science doesn’t like perpetual novelty.”

W. Brian Arthur

&quot;Coming from Your Inner Self&quot;, Conversation with W. Brian Arthur, Xerox PARC (16 April 1999) http://web.archive.org/web/20071011023150/http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Arthur-1999.html, by Joseph Jaworski, Gary Jusela, C. Otto Scharmer <br class="br">Kontext: Complexity theory is really a movement of the sciences. Standard sciences tend to see the world as mechanistic. That sort of science puts things under a finer and finer microscope. In biology the investigations go from classifying organisms to functions of organisms, then organs themselves, then cells, and then organelles, right down to protein and enzymes, metabolic pathways, and DNA. This is finer and finer reductionist thinking.<br>The movement that started complexity looks in the other direction. It’s asking, how do things assemble themselves? How do patterns emerge from these interacting elements? Complexity is looking at interacting elements and asking how they form patterns and how the patterns unfold. It’s important to point out that the patterns may never be finished. They’re open-ended. In standard science this hit some things that most scientists have a negative reaction to. Science doesn’t like perpetual novelty.

“Complexity theory is really a movement of the sciences.”

W. Brian Arthur

&quot;Coming from Your Inner Self&quot;, Conversation with W. Brian Arthur, Xerox PARC (16 April 1999) http://web.archive.org/web/20071011023150/http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Arthur-1999.html, by Joseph Jaworski, Gary Jusela, C. Otto Scharmer <br class="br">Kontext: Complexity theory is really a movement of the sciences. Standard sciences tend to see the world as mechanistic. That sort of science puts things under a finer and finer microscope. In biology the investigations go from classifying organisms to functions of organisms, then organs themselves, then cells, and then organelles, right down to protein and enzymes, metabolic pathways, and DNA. This is finer and finer reductionist thinking.<br>The movement that started complexity looks in the other direction. It’s asking, how do things assemble themselves? How do patterns emerge from these interacting elements? Complexity is looking at interacting elements and asking how they form patterns and how the patterns unfold. It’s important to point out that the patterns may never be finished. They’re open-ended. In standard science this hit some things that most scientists have a negative reaction to. Science doesn’t like perpetual novelty.

“[Market outcomes] depends on the cumulation of random events.”

W. Brian Arthur

Quelle: Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events, (1989), p. 124; as cited in: Tobias Georg Meyer (2012) Path Dependence in Two-sided Markets. p. 244

“Right after we published our first findings, we started getting letters from all over the country saying, "You know, all you guys have done is rediscover Austrian economics"… I admit I wasn't familiar with Hayek and von Mises at the time. But now that I've read them, I can see that this is essentially true.”

W. Brian Arthur

W. Brian Arthur, quoted in &quot;Complex Questions&quot; in Reason magazine (January 1996) http://reason.com/archives/1996/01/01/complex-questions/2, and in Hayek&#x27;s Challenge : An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek (2005) by Bruce Caldwell

“Increasing-returns economics has roots that go back 70 years or more, but its application to the economy as a whole is largely new.”

W. Brian Arthur

Quelle: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, (1994), p. 1: Chapter 1. Positive feedback in economics

“More than anything else technology creates our world. It creates our wealth, our economy, our very way of being.”

W. Brian Arthur

Quelle: The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. (2009), p. 10

“Where we observe the predominance of one technology or one economic outcome over its competitors we should thus be cautious of any exercise that seeks the means by which the winner's innate 'superiority' came to be translated into adoption.”

W. Brian Arthur

Quelle: Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events, (1989), p. 127, as cited in: John Gowdy (1994) Coevolutionary Economics: The Economy, Society and the Environment. p. 148

Ähnliche Autoren

Doris Lessing Foto
Doris Lessing4
britische Schriftstellerin None
William Golding Foto
William Golding3
britischer Schriftsteller None
Douglas Adams Foto
Douglas Adams66
britischer Schriftsteller None
Zygmunt Bauman Foto
Zygmunt Bauman70
britisch-polnischer Soziologe und Philosoph None
Richard Branson Foto
Richard Branson16
britischer Unternehmer und Ballonfahrer None
Freddie Mercury Foto
Freddie Mercury72
britischer Rocksänger None
Anthony Hopkins Foto
Anthony Hopkins1
britisch-amerikanischer Schauspieler None
Elton John Foto
Elton John71
britischer Musiker None
Audrey Hepburn Foto
Audrey Hepburn2
britische Schauspielerin None
Arthur Conan Doyle Foto
Arthur Conan Doyle36
britischer Arzt und Schriftsteller None