Birmingham and District Land Co. v. London and North-Western Railway Co. (1888), 57 L. J. Rep. (N. S.) C. D. 123.
Arthur Kekewich: Zitate auf Englisch
Davies v. Davies (1887), L. R. 36 C. D. 364; see also Egerton v. Earl Brownlow, 4 H. L. C. 1.
In re De Nicols. De Nicols v. Curlieb (1898), L. R. 1 C. D. [1898], p. 410.
“A decision of the House of Lords requires no sanction.”
In re Weall Andrews v. Weall (1889), L. R. 42 Ch. D. 679.
Lauri v. Renad (1892), L. R. 3 C. D. [1892], p. 413.
Ashworth v. Roberts (1890), L. J. Rep. (N. S.) 60 C. D. 28.
Horlock v. Wiggins (1888), L. R. 39 C. D. 143.
“I must look at the decision with reference to all the circumstances which led to it.”
In re England (1895), L. R. 2 C. D. [1895], p. 109.
“I wish to uphold counsel in the exercise of their discretion.”
In re Somerset; Somerset v. Earl Poulett (1893), L. R. [1894], 1 Ch. 249.
Blank v. Footman & Co. (1888), 57 L. J. (N. S.) C. D. 914.
“Motives do not concern me; they are a dangerous subject with which to deal.”
Whelan v. Palmer (1888), L. J. Rep. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 788.
Bolton Partners v. Lambert (1889), L. R. 41 C. D. 300.
Evans v. Manchester, &c. Rail. Co. (1887), L. J. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 157.
Young v. South African, &c. Syndicate (1896), L. R. 2 C. D. [1896], p. 278.
“Masterly inactivity may be prudence to one man, desperate rashness to another.”
In re Liverpool Household Stores Assoc. (1890), 59 L. J. Rep. C. D. 618.
Union Bank v. Munster (1887), L. R. 37 CD. 54.
In re Nottage (1895), L. R. 2 C. D. [1895], p. 653.