
— Bertrand Russell logician, one of the first analytic philosophers and political activist 1872 - 1970
Quelle: Cours de linguistique générale (1916), p. 111-112
Quelle: Course in General Linguistics
Kontext: Psychologically our thought-apart from its expression in words-is only a shapeless and indistinct mass. Philosophers and linguists have always agreed in recognizing that without the help of signs we would be unable to make a clear-cut, consistent distinction between two ideas. Without language, thought is a vague, uncharted nebula. here are no pre-existing ideas, and nothing is distinct before the appearance of language.
— Bertrand Russell logician, one of the first analytic philosophers and political activist 1872 - 1970
— Garth Stein, The Art of Racing in the Rain
Quelle: The Art of Racing in the Rain
— Eric A. Havelock 1903-1988, British classical philologist 1903 - 1988
"Chinese Characters and the Greek Alphabet" in Sino-Platonic Papers, 5 (December 1987) http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp005_chinese_greek.html
— Adam Schaff Polish Marxist philosopher and theorist 1913 - 2006
Quelle: Essays in the Philosophy of Language, 1967, p. 20-21
„But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.“
— George Orwell, buch 1984
"Politics and the English Language" (1946)
Quelle: 1984
Kontext: But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better.
Kontext: All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia. When the general atmosphere is bad, language must suffer. I should expect to find — this is a guess which I have not sufficient knowledge to verify — that the German, Russian and Italian languages have all deteriorated in the last ten or fifteen years, as a result of dictatorship.
But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better.
„Language is the dress of thought.“
— Samuel Johnson English writer 1709 - 1784
The Life of Cowley
Lives of the English Poets (1779–81)
— Ferdinand de Saussure, buch Cours de linguistique générale
Similarly, in the matter of language, one can separate neither sound from thought nor thought from sound; such separation could be achieved only by abstraction, which would lead either to pure psychology, or to pure phonology.
Quelle: Cours de linguistique générale (1916), p. 157; as cited in: Schaff (1962:11)
„Different languages, the same thoughts; servant to thoughts and their masters.“
— Dejan Stojanovic poet, writer, and businessman 1959
“Hidden Words,” p. 58
The Sun Watches the Sun (1999), Sequence: “A Stone and a Word”
„There is no language without deceit.“
— Italo Calvino, buch Invisible Cities
Quelle: Invisible Cities
„Language is the picture and counterpart of thought.“
— Mark Hopkins (educator) American educationalist and theologian 1802 - 1887
Address, Dedication of Williston Seminary, Dec. 1, 1841.
— Ferdinand de Saussure, buch Cours de linguistique générale
Quelle: Cours de linguistique générale (1916), p. 157; as cited in: Schaff (1962:11)
„Loose language suggests loose thought.“
— Theodore Dalrymple English doctor and writer 1949
Victim impact statements represent the sentimentalisation - the Diana-ification - of the criminal justice system, argues Theodore Dalrymple http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/001298.php (December 11, 2006).
The Social Affairs Unit (2006 - 2008)
„Language is the mother of thought, not its handmaiden.“
— Karl Kraus Czech playwright and publicist 1874 - 1936
Half-Truths and One-And-A-Half Truths (1976)
— Jane Roberts American Writer 1929 - 1984
Session 57, Page 119
The Early Sessions: Sessions 1-42, 1997, The Early Sessions: Book 2
— Fatima Jinnah Pakistani dental surgeon, biographer, stateswoman and one of the leading founders of Pakistan 1893 - 1967
Speech at Inauguration of Urdu Degree College, Karachi, June 1949 [citation needed]
— Peter Abelard, Sic et Non
Prologue as translated in Readings in European History, Vol. I (1904) edited by James Harvey Robinson, p. 450
Sic et Non (1120)
Kontext: There are many seeming contradictions and even obscurities in the innumerable writings of the church fathers. Our respect for their authority should not stand in the way of an effort on our part to come at the truth. The obscurity and contradictions in ancient writings may be explained upon many grounds, and may be discussed without impugning the good faith and insight of the fathers. A writer may use different terms to mean the same thing, in order to avoid a monotonous repetition of the same word. Common, vague words may be employed in order that the common people may understand; and sometimes a writer sacrifices perfect accuracy in the interest of a clear general statement. Poetical, figurative language is often obscure and vague.
Not infrequently apocryphal works are attributed to the saints. Then, even the best authors often introduce the erroneous views of others and leave the reader to distinguish between the true and the false. Sometimes, as Augustine confesses in his own case, the fathers ventured to rely upon the opinions of others.