
— Francis Escudero Filipino politician 1969
2009, Speech: The Socio-Economic Peace Program of Senator Francis Escudero
Quelle: The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck (2016), Chapter 9, “...And Then You Die” (p. 207)
— Francis Escudero Filipino politician 1969
2009, Speech: The Socio-Economic Peace Program of Senator Francis Escudero
— James Comey American lawyer and the seventh director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 1960
2010s, Hard Truths: Law Enforcement (2015)
— David Myatt British writer 1950
Quelle: Letter To My Undiscovered Self (2012) http://www.davidmyatt.info/letter-to-self.html
— Maimónides, buch The Guide for the Perplexed
Quelle: Guide for the Perplexed (c. 1190), Part III, Ch.12
Kontext: The second class of evils comprises such evils as people cause to each other, when, e. g., some of them use their strength against others. These evils are more numerous than those of the first kind... they likewise originate in ourselves, though the sufferer himself cannot avert them.
— Vera Stanley Alder British artist 1898 - 1984
Quelle: Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment (1950), Chapter I, Secrets Behind History
— Gerald Ford American politician, 38th President of the United States (in office from 1974 to 1977) 1913 - 2006
Conference of the International Association of Police Chiefs http://www.mcjackie.com/cobb.html (24 September 1974).
1970s
— Linus Torvalds Finnish-American software engineer and hacker 1969
LKML
June 18, 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/msg/43013fe224f562e0.
2000s, 2007
— Sophie Scholl White Rose member 1921 - 1943
As quoted in Seeking Peace : Notes and Conversations Along the Way (1998) by Johann Christoph Arnold, p. 155
Kontext: Just because so many things are in conflict does not mean that we ourselves should be divided. Yet time and time again one hears it said that since we have been put into a conflicting world, we have to adapt to it. Oddly, this completely unchristian idea is most often espoused by so-called Christians, of all people. How can we expect a righteousness to prevail when there is hardly anyone who will give himself up undividedly to a righteous cause?
— Allen West (politician) American politician; retired United States Army officer 1961
2010s, I'd like to see MORE football player protests — NOT less (27 September 2017)
— James Comey American lawyer and the seventh director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 1960
2010s, Hard Truths: Law Enforcement (2015)
— Aimee Mann American indie rock singer-songwriter (born 1960) 1960
"Soon Enough"
Song lyrics, Charmer (2012)
— F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby
Variante: They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.
Quelle: The Great Gatsby
— Marco Denevi, buch Falsificaciones
A menudo un dictador es un revolucionario que hizo carrera. A menudo un revolucionario es un burgués que no la hizo.
Falsificaciones (1977)
— Robert Trivers American evolutionary biologist and sociobiologist 1943
As quoted in Science at the Edge: Conversations with the Leading Scientific Thinkers of Today (2008), p. 170
Kontext: People are often unconscious of some of the mechanisms that naturally occur in them in a biased way. For example, if I do something that is beneficial to you or to others, I will use the active voice: I did this, I did that, then benefits rained down on you. But if I did something that harmed others, I unconsciously switch to a passive voice: this happened, then that happened, then unfortunately you suffered these costs. One example I always loved was a man in San Francisco who ran into a telephone pole with his car, and he described it to the police as, "the pole was approaching my car, I attempted to swerve out-of-the-way, when it struck me."
Let me give you another, the way in which group membership can entrain language-usages that are self-deceptive. You can divide people into in-groups or out-groups, or use naturally occurring in-groups and out-groups, and if someone's a member of your in-group and they do something nice, you give a general description of it – "he's a generous person". If they do something negative, you state a particular fact: "in this case he misled me", or something like that. But it's exactly the other way around for an out-group member. If an out-group member does something nice, you give a specific description of it: "she gave me directions to where I wanted to go". But if she does something negative, you say, "she's a selfish person". So these kinds of manipulations of reality are occurring largely unconsciously.